Leading Teams Today

A great deal of writing on leadership today focuses on the capabilities and behaviors formal leaders of large divisions or enterprises need to be effective. We read about such important characteristics as transparency, vision, authenticity, and optimism, and behaviors such as setting big, hairy, audacious goals (BHAGs). These are no doubt critical, but many firms have been increasingly relying on teams to help solve business problems and drive results, and leaders of these teams need other things. Teams are not a new trend. However, based on my experience working for several different Fortune 500 companies, what’s different about many teams today are the following:

  • Teams are led by individuals who have no formal authority over their teams; team members do not report to the leader nor are some of them even in the same business unit or division as the leader. In one organization where senior management was seeking to redesign and rationalize its staff functions globally, the majority of team members came from the line.
  • Team members are increasingly diverse – demographically, functionally and geographically. In their efforts to capture the best thinking globally, organizations are increasingly turning to their talented employees across the globe to participate in these teams. In many of the global teams I have led, team members have come from different regions of the world, and represent different levels of the organization. It was not uncommon, for example, to have a high potential junior team member from Germany in the same team as a Vice President of a corporate staff group.
  • The emergence of new networking technologies has made virtual team meetings at least in theory easier to manage.

These trends create different challenges for leaders of these types of teams. Because the team leader has no “legitimate power,” he must rely on other sources of influence to motivate and engage the team. Occasionally, the goals of the team may be in conflict with the agendas of team members. For example, team members from line organizations may see the centralization or consolidation of staff functions such as Finance, Procurement, and Human Resources as an attempt to reduce their control of resources and ability to influence these functions. In another team which I led, the members of the team were from an organization that had just been acquired by the parent company. While the goal was to accelerate the integration of the two companies, many of the team members initially perceived that the parent company was imposing its practices and management approach onto the acquired company.

Another challenge has to do with the level of commitment of the team members. While it is motivating for a team member in, say Latin America, to be invited to participate in a global team that might have significant impact on business results, that member has a “day job” and may have day-to-day pressures that will drive out any good intentions to contribute to the team. More importantly, the team members’ bonuses may be based on achieving business results for their area of responsibility versus contributing to the team’s success.

Finally, while some new technologies are elegant, they also may potentially reduce the opportunities for social bonding and therefore make it more difficult to establish trust among the team. With audio conferences, for example, it is difficult to make sure that everyone is equally engaged and is paying full attention to the conversation. Even with video conferencing, it can be difficult to replicate the give-and-take that can take place in a face-to-face meeting. Team leaders therefore need to make sure that they implement these four focused strategic actions:

  1. Create the conditions to ensure team success, especially around sponsorship, resources and rewards. Are the members, and especially you the leader, clear on who is sponsoring the project? Are you clear on what the expectations of the sponsor of the project are? Do you have the right resources for the team to succeed? Have you secured sufficient IT support to ensure you can use the technologies available and the appropriate training for your team? Have you worked with the team members’ managers and negotiated with them on time commitments, as well as how to recognize members for their contribution to the team? Have you worked with HR to design rewards to ensure it is worth it for members to be in the team?
  2. Engage and excite the team with a shared vision. This does not have to be some lofty abstract ideal but has to be something that challenges and inspires, that taps into a business issue that members all agree is important for the organization to address, and that may lead to some “breakthroughs.” How can you link the business impact of your project to the organization’s success? How can you engage the team so members become committed to participating in the team and doing the work?
  3. Leverage new technologies but face-to-face is always best. Have you given enough time for members to try out and become comfortable with the new technologies? Have you built into your budget expenses for face-to-face meetings and laid out a plan on how often these meetings should be held? In one team I was involved with, we worked closely with IT to make sure that virtual members, many of whom were in different countries, had the infrastructure in their locations to be able to participate effectively long-distance.
  4. Work on one-on-one relationships and team processes. Pay close attention to the cues on whether members are becoming less engaged; spend time individually with members to get to know them and understand their concerns and motivations. Also pay close attention to the way the team is functioning. If there are emerging conflicts, then determine the best way to resolve them and act swiftly. Goleman and Boyatzis have written about “socially intelligent” leaders. It is essential that team leaders have social intelligence, and senior managers selecting team leaders would do well to use this as an important criterion.

Team leaders are the cornerstone of today’s organizations. Being a team leader is a challenging assignment but it also carries great rewards, not only from a professional standpoint but also because it can personally be very fulfilling.

Center consultants are experts in leadership, teams and organizational change. Our programs have been used in hundreds of companies and we’ve certified over 800 internal and external trainers from around the world to use them.

To contact the Center, click here.


  1. AMARE ABATE says:


  2. I could not rerfrain from commenting. Well

Speak Your Mind